|
medsforless
Pharmacy Reviews | Full Pharmacy Profile | Rate This Pharmacy | Browse Other Pharmacies
Pharmacy Reviews
Company:
|
medsforless
|
Website:
|
http://www.medsforless.com/
|
Email:
|
[email protected]
|
City/State:
|
White Rock, Providence/ BC, V4A 9E2
|
Country:
|
Canada
|
Toll Free Phone:
|
866-600-5262
|
Fax:
|
800-807-0094
|
|
Results from MedsforlesseDrugSearch.com Member since July 2006.
|
Overall Rating
|
Overall Rating
  
3/5 Stars Based on 1 Reviews
|
|
Average Pharmacy Ratings
|
Pharmacy Ratings Help
Overall
The Overall Rating is the average of the Customer Service, Scheduled Delivery, Accuracy & Quality, and Secure Transaction ratings.
Overall 
|
 
|
Pharmacy Ratings Help
Customer Service
Did they offer professional and courteous customer service?
Customer Service 
|
 |
Pharmacy Ratings Help
Scheduled Delivery
Did you receive your medications on time?
Scheduled Delivery 
|
 |
Pharmacy Ratings Help
Accuracy & Quality
Did you receive counterfeit drugs? Were they past their expiration date? Did you receive the correct dosage?
Accuracy & Quality 
|
 
|
Pharmacy Ratings Help
Secure Transaction
Was all of your personal info and financial transactions SSL secured?
Secure Transaction 
|
 
|
|
|
Negative
Reviewer: sasha Reviewed On: December 10, 2007, 6:52 pm
|
|
There's something tricky going on with this place. Don't trust them! I bought prescription meds which according to their web site should have cost $99 in American dollars. I expected my card to be debited approx $108 (drug cost plus shipping). Instead, 2 separate charges were put through, one for $112 and another for $22. When I called for an explanation I got a run-a-round. Various lame explanations were offered: A change in the US/Canadian exchange rate, a claim that I'd misread the price info at the web site. I wasn't buying it. They said they'd call back, but did not. I called again & talked to the owner. He agreed to charge the correct amount $108, & credit my card for the excess they'd sucked out of my account, but the excuses he gave for the original mistake were very implausible.
Report Problem
|
|