Join Today & Get 4% Cash Back Then 6, 7...Up to 10% Off Reorders!

April 24, 2008, 11:13 am
Flag as Inappropriate ewills  

TUESDAY, April 22 (HealthDay News) -- The Medicare Part D benefit has resulted in some improvements for seniors but no real revolution in prescription drug adherence.

A new report finds that Medicare beneficiaries are less likely to forego basic needs such as food to pay for medicine, but the sickest patients are still skipping meds due to burdensome costs.

"It's a mixed picture. We saw some things to be happy about and others to be concerned about," said study author Jeanne Madden, an instructor in the department of ambulatory care and prevention at Harvard Medical School in Boston. "Although this is the third year [of the program], the good data is just starting to come to the surface. It bears a lot of additional scrutiny."

Madden's study is in the April 23/30 issue of theJournal of the American Medical Association.

"This study reveals that the federal government has more work to do to assure that the Medicare Part D program meets the needs of the most vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries," Gail Shearer, director of health policy analysis at Consumers Union, said in a statement. "It is unacceptable that the sickest beneficiaries may not be filling prescriptions or taking the full doses or courses of their medicines because they simply can't afford to."

Medicare Part D, which provides drug benefits, took effect in January 2006. More than half of Medicare beneficiaries have enrolled in the program. Some 10 percent of beneficiaries still have no drug coverage, compared to up to 38 percent before the program took effect.

Surveys have shown that without adequate prescription drug benefits, seniors tend to skip doses, reduce doses or leave prescriptions unfilled. This, in turn, can result in serious health outcomes, including even heart attack and stroke.

Madden and her team looked at survey responses from 24,234 Medicare beneficiaries to determine how Medicare Part D had changed cost-related adherence to drug regimens.

In 2004 and 2005, before Part D, 15.2 percent and 14.1 percent of beneficiaries, respectively, skipped pills because of cost, versus 11.5 percent in 2006, after the program was implemented.

Similarly, in 2004 and 2005, 10.6 percent and 11.1 percent of beneficiaries, respectively, skimped on basic needs so as to be able to pay for medications, a percentage which declined to 7.6 percent in 2006.

The sickest individuals continued to skip pills at about the same rate both before and after Part D, although they were less likely to forego basic necessities. These beneficiaries are more likely to falling into the "donut hole," when drug costs are between $2,250 and $5,100, individuals have to pay the full cost of their drugs.

More

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/22/AR2008042201959.html

I don't think this is anything we didn't already know. If they would take all the money they use conducting all these common sense studies and give it to senior's, I bet we wouldn't need Medicare.

I agree. Some of these studies are just plain stupid.

There are plenty of things we waste money on that could be put towards solving issues such as health care, gas prices, and the rising cost of food. One of the great things about the US is that we have every right to waste our money as we see fit unfortunately.

It doesn't surprise me either. Such things are common even among non-Medicaid people who need prescriptions. If you can cut back a bit to make them last longer or go without filling a script you do because you need to pay the heating bill. At least it seems to be getting better for some people.