<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s abusing Google ads? No, it&#8217;s not online pharmacies &#8212; it&#8217;s Big Pharma</title>
	<atom:link href="/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/</link>
	<description>Helping Americans get safe access to affordable medications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:36:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-206501</link>
		<dc:creator>deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-206501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When my insurance wouldn&#039;t pay for my sons bills the canadian online pharmacy was able to provide his prescriptions for $200/mo which in the US was $1500 month thanks to Lilly.  I couldn&#039;t afford that, or for him to be in the hospital without insurance.  Shame on Google and the US Pharmacology industry for worshipping the almighty dollar instead of patient care.  Who is more concerned about people, those who charge $1500 or those who charge $200 for the same product?  What happened to free enterprise and letting the market determine the value of a product?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my insurance wouldn&#8217;t pay for my sons bills the canadian online pharmacy was able to provide his prescriptions for $200/mo which in the US was $1500 month thanks to Lilly.  I couldn&#8217;t afford that, or for him to be in the hospital without insurance.  Shame on Google and the US Pharmacology industry for worshipping the almighty dollar instead of patient care.  Who is more concerned about people, those who charge $1500 or those who charge $200 for the same product?  What happened to free enterprise and letting the market determine the value of a product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Byrd</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-205680</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-205680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Primadogga, you&#039;re right.  The best way to confirm a CIPA seal is legit is to check at the CIPA site, where they have a list of all approved pharmaices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primadogga, you&#8217;re right.  The best way to confirm a CIPA seal is legit is to check at the CIPA site, where they have a list of all approved pharmaices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primadogga</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-205673</link>
		<dc:creator>Primadogga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-205673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just be sure, before buying from a Canadian pharmacy, that it really IS registered with CIPA, etc. I ran into one the other day that had a CIPA seal on its page, but was not registered with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just be sure, before buying from a Canadian pharmacy, that it really IS registered with CIPA, etc. I ran into one the other day that had a CIPA seal on its page, but was not registered with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health News: Cialis Bathtubs and Other Prescription Drug Commercial Imponderables &#124; The eDrugSearch Blog</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-205631</link>
		<dc:creator>Health News: Cialis Bathtubs and Other Prescription Drug Commercial Imponderables &#124; The eDrugSearch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-205631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month, the FDA warned pharmaceutical companies that all of their online ads need to include these warnings, too. This goes for those all-text ads in Google search results that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month, the FDA warned pharmaceutical companies that all of their online ads need to include these warnings, too. This goes for those all-text ads in Google search results that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Byrd</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-205517</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-205517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VIPPs is opposed to all Canadian pharmacies, including those licensed by the Canadian government and approved by PharmacyChecker.   For Canadian pharmacies, PharmacyChecker, IMPAC, CIPA and MIPA are better standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VIPPs is opposed to all Canadian pharmacies, including those licensed by the Canadian government and approved by PharmacyChecker.   For Canadian pharmacies, PharmacyChecker, IMPAC, CIPA and MIPA are better standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>/edsblog/whos-abusing-google-ads-no-its-not-online-pharmacies-its-big-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-205516</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1244#comment-205516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d personally wish Google deindexed all those pharmacy sites that do not have

VIPPS accreditation
BBB accreditation
TrustE accreditation &amp;
HonCode accreditation

from their main index as well as from their Adwords network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d personally wish Google deindexed all those pharmacy sites that do not have</p>
<p>VIPPS accreditation<br />
BBB accreditation<br />
TrustE accreditation &amp;<br />
HonCode accreditation</p>
<p>from their main index as well as from their Adwords network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
