Damian Trouse of the Houston Chronicle writes:
Licensing deals between pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies is the norm for the industry, giving development stage companies the money to continue developing products, while larger companies get a chance to bolster their product pipelines.
But with more large companies facing pipeline holes, biotech companies are seeing more money being thrown their way for innovative products, and the deals could lead to future acquisitions.
“That’s going to continue to heat up and pick up,” said Jason Napadano, senior biotechnology analyst at Zach’s Investment Research. “The reason it’s happening is that you have these large pharmaceutical companies with an unprecedented number of products going off patent.”
That could amount to billions of dollars in losses for some of the major pharmaceutical companies.
He goes on to say:
In October, Merck & Co. said it would buy small biotechnology outfit Sirna Therapeutics Inc. for $1.1 billion. Abbott Laboratories is in the process of buying Kos Pharmaceuticals for $3.7 billion.
“Big pharma could start knocking on the door of biotech with market caps of $5 billion,” said Morningstar analyst Karen Andersen.
“If you’re a pharmaceutical company and you want these products and need these products, biotech can continue to demand these types of big prices,” Zack’s Napadano said.
By most estimates, the market for licensing deals and pricier acquisitions will continue into 2007. News last week that Pfizer Inc. ended a late-stage program on its experimental heart drug highlighted the company’s pipeline problems, with many analysts predicting it will acquire another company, possibly within the next year.
I hardly think drug companies buying out small biotech firms in order to procure new drugs is the same thing as in-house development. It speaks poorly of Big Pharma’s R&D efforts. The sports analogy would be a team that has to bring in big-name free agents because it doesn’t have a good farm system or doesn’t draft well.
Which raises the question: Doesn’t the government gives Big Pharma the monopoly on the American drug market in order to promote new and innovative drugs? And if that’s not happening, why are American consumers suffering in order to boost Big Pharma’s profits?







One Response to When it comes to new drugs, Big Pharma is buying its R&D
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
-
-
How to Safely Buy Prescription Drugs Online from Cary Byrd on Vimeo.
-
Search Blog Posts
-
Trending Content
-
Blogroll
- Bullet Wisdom
- Christian Social Network
- DrugWonks.com
- Eye on FDA
- GoozNews
- Health 2.0
- In the Pipeline
- Jesus Christ Our King
- Kevin, M.D.
- Pharm Aid
- Pharma Marketing
- PharmaGossip
- Pharmalot
- San Antonio Asphalt
- San Antonio Life Insurance
- San Antonio Pressure Washing
- The Angry Pharmacist
- The Health Care Blog
- The Peter Rost Blog
- World Vision
-
Tags
big pharma Canadian drugs canadian pharmacies canadian pharmacy consumer reports craig newmark divine healing Drug costs drug prices Drug reimportation eDrugSearch.com FDA Fosamax Generic drugs healing scriptures Health 2.0 healthcare reform Hypertension Jehova Rophe Jesus Christ Lipitor Metformin miracles nabp online pharmacy dictionary online prescriptions osteoporosis peter rost Pharmacies pharmacists pharmacychecker pharmacy spam phrma Prescription drug coupons Prescription drugs prescription medication Proverbs 3:5-8 reimportation relenza Roche saving money swine flu Tamiflu The Great Physician The Lord our Healer -
Archives
- July 2013 (11)
- June 2013 (8)
- May 2013 (8)
- April 2013 (8)
- March 2013 (10)
- February 2013 (14)
- January 2013 (6)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- November 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (2)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (5)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (1)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (6)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (10)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (10)
- December 2008 (24)
- November 2008 (22)
- October 2008 (27)
- September 2008 (28)
- August 2008 (23)
- July 2008 (30)
- June 2008 (32)
- May 2008 (29)
- April 2008 (27)
- March 2008 (19)
- February 2008 (26)
- January 2008 (35)
- December 2007 (23)
- November 2007 (26)
- October 2007 (36)
- September 2007 (25)
- August 2007 (33)
- July 2007 (36)
- June 2007 (31)
- May 2007 (32)
- April 2007 (22)
- March 2007 (22)
- February 2007 (29)
- January 2007 (18)
- December 2006 (56)
- November 2006 (16)
-
Recent Comments
- Sophie on Reclast’s “jaw problems” caused by too many warnings, spoken too quickly?
- Marcy on How to Get Coupons on Prescription Drugs
- Cary Byrd on Maine Becomes First State to Allow Prescription Drug Importation from Licensed Mail-Order Pharmacies
- brenda eppinette on Maine Becomes First State to Allow Prescription Drug Importation from Licensed Mail-Order Pharmacies
- Ranee on What is the Difference Between Effexor and Cymbalta?
Pharmaceutical indistry is going same transformation what happened in movie industry long ago.
There is end of era of “Big Studios”, now projects are outsourced to small innovative companies.