Vioxx lesson: When you’re bad, be VERY bad
Remember the little problem with Vioxx? As a result, Vioxx still has more than 13,800 lawsuits on the docket. Over the last two years, only four trials have been held, but Judge Carol Higbee is looking to pick up the pace — from glacier slow to snail-in-winter slow. Higbee’s goal, according to Pharmalot, is to “ease the logjam”. But Pharmalot points out:
With so many lawsuits, it’s entirely possible that many of the Vioxx plaintiffs will never see their day in court, or collect if they do win, because Merck is appealing every outcome that doesn’t go its way. For this reason, Wall Street believes Merck’s Vioxx liability is $5 billion, not the $25 billion or more that many once estimated.
Lesson for Big Pharma: Sometimes it’s better for your product to suck a lot, rather than just a little. (Especially for your lawyers.)
Related Posts
-
Murkier and murkier for Merck
-
Merck and Schering-Plough: partners in slime
- The Fosamax mistrial, and other options in osteoporosis medication
-
Merck and insurance companies at cross-purposes over Gardasil
-
The latest verdict against Accutane
-
Stopping Big Pharma From Using New .pharmacy Domain To Block Legal Pharmacies They Don’t Like







-
Subscribe in a reader
-
Search Blog Posts
-
-
-
How to Safely Buy Prescription Drugs Online from Cary Byrd on Vimeo.
-
Archives
-
Our Healthcare100 Ranking