<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How valuable are online physician ratings systems?</title>
	<atom:link href="/edsblog/how-valuable-are-online-physician-ratings-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/edsblog/how-valuable-are-online-physician-ratings-systems/</link>
	<description>Helping Americans get safe access to affordable medications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:36:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Byrd</title>
		<link>/edsblog/how-valuable-are-online-physician-ratings-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-205421</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1019#comment-205421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheryl, thanks very much for your comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl, thanks very much for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl Reed</title>
		<link>/edsblog/how-valuable-are-online-physician-ratings-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-205418</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1019#comment-205418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iâ€™m from Angieâ€™s List and just wanted to chime in that we agree that the most valuable health care ratings will come from services that value accountability and fairness â€“ two things that have been a priority for us for the past 14 years. Weâ€™ve invested a lot of resources â€“ both human and technological â€“ in offering reports that are as honest, fair and accurate as possible.  

1. We don&#039;t allow anonymous reviews. 
2. Members are held responsible for accurately reporting their experiences.
3. Service providers can&#039;t put themselves on the List -- only a member can do that. 
4. We use both technological and human monitoring to catch attempts to game the system, and we take action against guideline violators. 
5. We alert providers the first time a member reports on them and offer â€“ free of charge -- to alert them to any future reports so they know what&#039;s being said about them.
6. We also encourage providers to respond either on our List or directly to members. 

I find it interesting that many physicians believe the majority of online ratings are negative. Weâ€™ve found it to be the exact opposite â€“ at least on Angieâ€™s List. Our members rely on each other and love to share information about great service providers â€“ doctors as well as plumbers. We strongly believe that physicians should embrace sites like Angieâ€™s List because thereâ€™s far more benefit than they apparently realize.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m from Angieâ€™s List and just wanted to chime in that we agree that the most valuable health care ratings will come from services that value accountability and fairness â€“ two things that have been a priority for us for the past 14 years. Weâ€™ve invested a lot of resources â€“ both human and technological â€“ in offering reports that are as honest, fair and accurate as possible.  </p>
<p>1. We don&#8217;t allow anonymous reviews.<br />
2. Members are held responsible for accurately reporting their experiences.<br />
3. Service providers can&#8217;t put themselves on the List &#8212; only a member can do that.<br />
4. We use both technological and human monitoring to catch attempts to game the system, and we take action against guideline violators.<br />
5. We alert providers the first time a member reports on them and offer â€“ free of charge &#8212; to alert them to any future reports so they know what&#8217;s being said about them.<br />
6. We also encourage providers to respond either on our List or directly to members. </p>
<p>I find it interesting that many physicians believe the majority of online ratings are negative. Weâ€™ve found it to be the exact opposite â€“ at least on Angieâ€™s List. Our members rely on each other and love to share information about great service providers â€“ doctors as well as plumbers. We strongly believe that physicians should embrace sites like Angieâ€™s List because thereâ€™s far more benefit than they apparently realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health News: Healthcare 100 Surpasses 1,000 Health Blogs &#124; The eDrugSearch Blog</title>
		<link>/edsblog/how-valuable-are-online-physician-ratings-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-205414</link>
		<dc:creator>Health News: Healthcare 100 Surpasses 1,000 Health Blogs &#124; The eDrugSearch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=1019#comment-205414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Peter Rost Blog          &#8592; How valuable are online physician ratings systems? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Peter Rost Blog          &larr; How valuable are online physician ratings systems? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
