<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The eDrugSearch Blog &#187; Metformin</title>
	<atom:link href="/edsblog/category/metformin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/edsblog</link>
	<description>Helping Americans Buy Prescription Drugs Online from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Diabetes drug may be a little fishy</title>
		<link>/edsblog/diabetes-drug-may-be-a-little-fishy/</link>
		<comments>/edsblog/diabetes-drug-may-be-a-little-fishy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cary Byrd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bristol-Myers Squibb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metformin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription drugs]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>metformin</category>
	<category>odor</category>
	<category>fishy</category>
	<category>fishy</category>
	<category>smell</category>
	<category>fortamet</category>
	<category>glumetza</category>
	<category>glucophage</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/?p=2936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New studies released today found that many who take the popular diabetes medication metformin find the odor off-putting, and some have trouble taking the medication. The &#8220;fishy&#8221; odor is especially noticeable in the immediate release versions. &#8220;Metformin is an excellent drug, but the immediate-release formulation may have an odor to it. The smell is fishy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/edsblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/metformin-fishy-smell.jpg"><img src="/edsblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/metformin-fishy-smell.jpg" alt="metformin fishy smell Diabetes drug may be a little fishy" title="metformin fishy smell" width="473" height="375" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2947" /></a></p>
<p>New studies released today found that many who take the popular diabetes medication <a href="/web.php?q=metformin&#038;butSearch.x=0&#038;butSearch.y=0">metformin</a> find the odor off-putting, and some have trouble taking the medication. </p>
<p>The &#8220;fishy&#8221; odor is especially noticeable in the immediate release versions. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Metformin is an excellent drug, but the immediate-release formulation may have an odor to it. The smell is fishy or like the inside of an inner tube, and in a patient&#8217;s mind, because it smells like something that has gone bad, they may think the drug isn&#8217;t good,&#8221; explained one of the letter&#8217;s authors, J. Russell May, a clinical professor at the University of Georgia College of Pharmacy at the Medical College of Georgia. </p>
<p>However, May said, &#8220;some metformin products on the market are extended-release and the drug is embedded and released slow, over time. These products have much less smell, if any.&#8221; </p>
<p>May and his colleagues wrote the letter to the journal to raise awareness of this issue, especially because nausea is a commonly reported side effect of metformin. &#8220;Is it nausea from the medication, or is it because it smells bad?&#8221; May said.</p></blockquote>
<p>The drug&#8217;s odor may make it seem like it has gone bad, but doctors have reassured patients that it is just something in the formula of the medication, and the drug is still affective at treating diabetes and is not dangerous. </p>
<p>Bristol-Meyers Squib who is one of the major producers of metformin released a statement saying, </p>
<blockquote><p>Bristol-Myers Squibb is aware that the inherent characteristics of metformin have been associated with a mild odor upon opening of the bottle, so these type of reports are not unexpected. It&#8217;s important to note there has been no correlation between an odor and the efficacy of metformin, which has been on the market in the U.S. since 1995.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some of the brand versions of metformin that may give off this &#8220;fishy&#8221; odor are: <a href="/web.php?q=glucophage&#038;butSearch.x=0&#038;butSearch.y=0">Glucophage</a>, <a href="/web.php?q=glumetza&#038;butSearch.x=0&#038;butSearch.y=0">Glumetza</a>, <a href="/web.php?q=fortamet&#038;butSearch.x=0&#038;butSearch.y=0">Fortamet</a>, and Riomet.</p>
<p>Patients prescribed metformin should continue on their regular regiment, but should certainly let their doctor know if they are affected by the smell. They may be able to switch to the extended release version or possibly another brand. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/edsblog/diabetes-drug-may-be-a-little-fishy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to FDA: Older diabetes drugs are cheaper, as effective and have fewer side effects than newer ones</title>
		<link>/edsblog/note-to-fda-older-diabetes-drugs-are-cheaper-as-effective-and-have-fewer-side-effects-than-newer-ones/</link>
		<comments>/edsblog/note-to-fda-older-diabetes-drugs-are-cheaper-as-effective-and-have-fewer-side-effects-than-newer-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cary Byrd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metformin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thiazolidinediones]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category></category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/edsblog/note-to-fda-older-diabetes-drugs-are-cheaper-as-effective-and-have-fewer-side-effects-than-newer-ones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears someone finally decided to take a look at the effectiveness and benefits of older diabetes drugs (such as metformin) compared with newer, more expensive ones (such as Avandia). Dr. Shari Bolen of Johns Hopkins University studied various medical databases and found 216 relevant studies and two systematic reviews. According to Reuters: Older drugs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears someone finally decided to take a look at the effectiveness and benefits of older diabetes drugs (such as metformin) compared with newer, more expensive ones (<a target="_blank" href="/edsblog/fdas-drug-monitoring-process-flunks-another-test/">such as Avandia</a>).  Dr. Shari Bolen of Johns Hopkins University studied various medical databases and found 216 relevant studies and two systematic reviews.  According to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSARM67703720070716">Reuters</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Older drugs controlled blood sugar levels about as well as the thiazolidinediones [Avandia] did. There were some differences, however, in other effects.</p>
<p>Thiazolidinediones were the only drugs that increased HDL &#8220;good&#8221; cholesterol levels, but they also increased LDL &#8220;bad&#8221; cholesterol levels. Metformin reduced LDL cholesterol levels, while the other agents appeared to have no effect on cholesterol levels.</p>
<p>With the exception of metformin, the drugs generally increased body weight by 1 to 5 kilograms. Compared with other drugs, sulfonylureas and repaglinide were tied to increased risks of low blood sugar, thiazolidinediones were linked to heart failure, and metformin raised the risk of stomach and intestinal problems.</p>
<p>&#8220;Each oral diabetes agent is associated with adverse events that counterbalance its benefits,&#8221; the researchers conclude. &#8220;Overall, metformin seemed to have the best profile of benefit to risk.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/edsblog/note-to-fda-older-diabetes-drugs-are-cheaper-as-effective-and-have-fewer-side-effects-than-newer-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
